Oklahoma: Not OK

A new anti-choice law has gone into effect in Oklahoma, after the Republican-controlled state legislature overrode Governor Brad Henry’s veto of the proposed bill. The law, considered by some to be one of the strongest anti-abortion measures in the country, requires women seeking to have an abortion to hear a description of “the dimensions of the fetus, whether arms, legs and internal organs are visible and whether there is cardiac activity.” Additionally, the individual performing the ultrasound must also “turn the “screen depicting the ultrasound images toward the woman to see them.”
As one might guess, lawsuits have already been filed in an attempt to overturn the law, though until a judge issues an initial ruling, clinics must conform to the statute. Beyond the rather abhorrent intrusion into the doctor-patient relationship by the Oklahoma state legislature, the bill also compels patients to hear information that may have no relevance to their medical care and, extremely troublingly, offers no exemptions for incidences of rape and incest… meaning that a survivor of sexual assault would also be forced to hear this information. Which seems to me to be beyond insensitive, and firmly into the territory of outright cruelty.
According to a provider of abortion services in the state, women have already been leaving the ultrasound room in tears because of the new law. Tony Lauinger, state chairman for Oklahomans for Life, said that he hoped that the bill would help to “prevent psychological trauma to pregnant woman.” Which is, of course, laughable.
The Oklahoma legislature should not be making medical decisions for its constituents. It shouldn’t be forcing survivors of sexual assault to hear information that could be damaging to them. And it shouldn’t be hiding behind the notion of protecting women from trauma, when it really seems like they’re much more interested in inflicting it.
This is a very interesting situation! It does seem a little but hypocritical on the anti-choicers side. They shouldn’t be in favor of giving women information- we should. This is why I feel conflicted. The mission of Planned Parenthood is to inform women about what is really going on with their bodies isn’t it? On the other hand it is insensitive… BUT as pro-choicers we want women to know the truth. Any thoughts from fellow pro-choicers who are interested in letting knowing women know whats going on with their body and being sensitive to this issue?
How about this-does anything in the law say that this information has to be given in English, or in a language that the mother speaks? How about, at least for victims of rape and incest, congenial doctors give that information in another language-that way they’ve done it, it;s pro-forma, the woman doesn’t have to listen. I could write up a transliterated script in Hebrew if any docs in OK are interested.