Comments for Choice 2.0

Comment on A Condom That Fights Back by martha

martha — Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:05:49 +0000

this worries me a bit. I worry that these incapacitated men would turn violent.

Comment on South Carolina’s Serious Issues by Ultra(un)sound Laws

Ultra(un)sound Laws — Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:13:59 +0000

[...] Patient Forum « South Carolina’s Serious Issues [...]

Comment on Oklahoma: Not OK by chanakf

chanakf — Sat, 15 May 2010 15:10:40 +0000

How about this-does anything in the law say that this information has to be given in English, or in a language that the mother speaks? How about, at least for victims of rape and incest, congenial doctors give that information in another language-that way they’ve done it, it;s pro-forma, the woman doesn’t have to listen. I could write up a transliterated script in Hebrew if any docs in OK are interested.

Comment on Pap Rally by More Than you Think…the other services

More Than you Think…the other services — Tue, 11 May 2010 13:23:30 +0000

[...] wife, a daughter, a mother abut health issues. You don’t have to be as in-your-face as, say, Kathy Griffin, but let’s start the needed dialogue on these important health issues. And let’s work [...]

Comment on Oklahoma: Not OK by rebelwoman

rebelwoman — Sun, 09 May 2010 04:23:35 +0000

This is a very interesting situation! It does seem a little but hypocritical on the anti-choicers side. They shouldn’t be in favor of giving women information- we should. This is why I feel conflicted. The mission of Planned Parenthood is to inform women about what is really going on with their bodies isn’t it? On the other hand it is insensitive… BUT as pro-choicers we want women to know the truth. Any thoughts from fellow pro-choicers who are interested in letting knowing women know whats going on with their body and being sensitive to this issue?

Comment on Utah’s “Reckless” Bill by Wimmers and Losers

Wimmers and Losers — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:23:18 +0000

[...] I wrote a post on legislation introduced in Utah which could criminalize certain types of miscarriages. The bill has now passed the Utah [...]

Comment on Stripping Women’s Coverage by Setting the Bar Low on Women’s Health

Setting the Bar Low on Women’s Health — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:43:37 +0000

[...] their cue from federal elected officials, numerous counties and municipalities are considering the removal of abortion care coverage from employee health insurance [...]

Comment on Who Does Apex Mayor Keith Weatherly Really Represent? by Small Town Politics

Small Town Politics — Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:13:50 +0000

[...] was unanimous because Mayor Keith Weatherly presented it as settled legal matter. (Check out our previous post for background on Mayor [...]

Comment on No Justice by Without Honor

Without Honor — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:25:15 +0000

[...] few weeks ago, I posted a piece about a woman in Bangladesh who was lashed for having committed the “grievous crime” of getting pregnant as the [...]

Comment on Who Does Apex Mayor Keith Weatherly Really Represent? by Thief in the Night: Usurping Women’s Healthcare in Local Government | Cakalak Conspiracy

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:11:33 +0000

[...] enlisted his legislative aid, Apex town mayor Keith Weatherly, who just “stumble onto” the “shocking revelation” that his town’s [...]